By this period artists used this movement so they can make a particular light in the society to show how cruel and how much unfair their life was. This
style of Art reflects that in the 19th century had been a
negative age at that time. It was origin from a group of artists, writers and intellectuals
in the late 1840`s.The most paintings where about politics and slaves
at that time.
Some artists realism to
show their problems issues through political problems, and other artists used the
realism to paint scene of urban landscape of life or portraits of nudes. They
used to make the painting very realistic to show their life.
In their paintings
they used to show reflecting surface, shadow, light and as much details
as possible for both still-life or live views interpretation, to show the object
that the artist wanted to create.
French Realism emerged
in times of social hardship and political in the early 1848, in the 3rd revolution that had happened in Paris. Then In the 19th century,
art of Courbet's caused a lot of controversy, because they came against the academic rules of the Salon. The rules of the Salon were that the paintings must be small, pleasant, escapist works that can be enjoyed by the people who were living in the town. So Courbet’s art went against standard academic practice so they weren't expected in the Salon.
This painting of
Gustave Courbet – ‘The Stone Breakers’ that is made with oil on canvas. This
was a painting that Courbet creates, that was against the rules of the Salon were
accepting. It was made in a sketchy way and it shows a lot of focus of the two
men that are breaking stones, to focus more on the two men, he made a plain background.
These two figures are breaking and removing the stone from the road that had
been built. They used to be forced to make some work that they didn`t want to
do at that time.
Then this painting of Millet-
‘The Gleaners’ The painter had a lot of meaning in this painting. This is
showing three feminine figures of normal people, that are working in a farm, and
one rule that the artist went against it, was that he painted a rich man on a
horse watching the women working from far away, at that time that wasn’t
acceptable because rich and important people were given the much importance of
the painting rather than the normal people.
In these two painting
there are the same meaning during the 19th century, that the artists
wanted to show the way of life that they had been through.
At that time, there were the
paintings of the nude people, that artists used ideal forms to have the perfect painting that the Salon want to exhibit, but like the artists of above, they didn’t
want to follow the formula that the Salon was accepting so they paint their
paintings in their style as they want, some critics were saying that these
paintings were 'the glorification of the ugly', meaning that these artists weren’t
painting the ideal figures of nudes showing precision and perfectness but the
figures of nudes with all the defects that the body will have. They made these type of art to show that no one was perfect and have some defects in their body.
Courbet.G. 1853. The Bathers[Oil on Canvas 227x193cm ] Musee' Fabre Montepellier- This painting was one of the painting that Courbet didn't want to show the perfectness like the other artists done n their paintings.
Gerad, F. 1798. Cupid and Pscyhe.[Oil on canvas 186x 132cm ] Louvre.Paris- This is one of the painting that the Salon accept beacuse it was the 'right size' and the 'right perfection' that they want to show to people so they can enjoy themselves.
The Stonebreakers - Smarthistory. 2014. The Stonebreakers -
Smarthistory. [ONLINE] Available at: http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/the-stonebreakers.html.
[Accessed 26 February 2014].